In 1996 an early and novel spam email was circulating the Internet.
(Google 'TipToe0001' for more information).

I felt this was an attempt to scare people into accepting greater
regulation of the Internet. The United States military states that it
considers the Internet as an enemy weapon these days.

I decided pull apart the conflicting emotions and ethics of this 
spam by rewriting it, conflating the villain and victim. The creator 
of pornography would also be its subject. How could you be angry 
with the victim ? or if you were as is sometimes the case, how would 
you decide to react ?

My suspicion concerning child pornography is that it holds the key
to greater pan societal control.

Violence is violence. Sex is not violence.

Corrupt powers maintain positions by persuading people that something
is something else - classic propaganda distortion and delusion.

Once you start to see that sex has nothing to do with violence or as
much as say for instance football, then we can start to see the
ideals, morals and powers dealing with sex.

Its worth noting that no one I have ever met can actually define
what sex is making me suspect that its a religion or ideology.

One clue is the denial by the adult world of child sexual interest
and sexuality.

To somehow admit that children are sexual undermines some essentials
foundations of our developed society.

My suspicion is that the mechanisms of infantilisation of the market
place are these foundations.

We are constantly persuaded to be irresponsible and childlike so
that we more readily consume junk and less interested in taking
responsibility whether that be environmental or societal.

The rewritten text was removed from public view on the irational
server as the Avon and Somerset Police threatened to impound our
server, raid my home and prosecute me for child pornography
offences. They didn't state which offence i had committed.